The roundup is formatted with the title of the story, followed by the news source in parentheses and a brief summary. If you find a particularly interesting article, please send it to firstname.lastname@example.org for inclusion in next week’s roundup.
A recent paper based on data from the National Science Foundations’ Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates showed that the number of postdoctoral scholars at degree-granting institutions has decreased since 2010.
The decline of the postdoc population and research enterprise sustainability (ASBMB Policy Blotter)
The National Institutes of Health has called for a moratorium on funding for human-animal, stem-cell chimera research. This week the NIH hosted a workshop to assess if new policies were required to govern chimera research.
U.S. officials promise to create new policies for suspended ‘chimera’ research (San Jose Mercury News)
Should Human Stem Cells Be Used To Make Partly Human Chimeras? (Breakthroughs)
The U.S. Congress passed a two-year budget which will provide partial relief from the budget caps and increase discretionary spending by 5.2 percent in fiscal 2016 but it is unclear how that will translate to increases in funding for the NIH.
Data check: How U.S. budget deal turns $30 billion into $3 billion (Science Insider)
Passage of the Bipartisan Budget Agreement of 2015 – What it really means (ASBMB Policy Blotter)
The White House released the Privacy and Trust Principles which will guide the Precision Medicine Initiative.
Precision Medicine Initiative: Privacy and Trust Principles (Whitehouse.gov)
In 2001, President George W. Bush restricted the use of federal funds for embryonic stem cell research. Today as many as 15 states have programs to fund this type of research.
CRISPR: A path through the thicket (Nature) A group of stakeholders convened in the United Kingdom to discuss ethical concerns that surround CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in humans.
NIH metric that assesses article impact stirs debate (Nature) A new metric developed by the NIH called the Relative Citation Ratio measures impact of individual journal articles by normalizing the citation frequency across disciplines.