Browsed by
Tag: Peer Review

Science policy news: weekly roundup: February 19, 2016 ?>

Science policy news: weekly roundup: February 19, 2016

The roundup is formatted with the title of the story, followed by the news source in parentheses and a brief summary. If you find a particularly interesting article, please send it to for inclusion in next week’s roundup.   The U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee will not introduce companion legislation to the U.S. House’s 21st Century Cures.

The Big Bad Wolves ?>

The Big Bad Wolves

There has been a lot of congressional huffing and puffing recently challenging the validity of peer review. Some members of Congress are taking controversial stands, claiming that certain types of peer-reviewed, scientific research are a waste of taxpayer dollars.

U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., added an amendment to NIH funding legislation that would defund three specific NIH peer-reviewed grants related to HIV/AIDS research. Particularly worrisome is that the amendment passed the House. While Issa’s amendment most likely will be removed in final versions of the bill funding NIH in 2010 (Labor/HHS/education appropriations), it is startling that such an amendment would be approved on the House floor.